FWO v Stuart James Angel
Citation: FWO-LIT/2025-2026/stuart-james-angel/2026-03-13
At a glance
- Respondent
- Stuart James Angel
- Penalty
- $17,502
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) commenced proceedings against Stuart James Angel. The proceedings concerned non-compliance with a compliance notice and failure to provide payslips. The case was heard on 13 March 2026.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia found Stuart James Angel in breach. The court ordered a penalty of $17,502. The decision is documented in Fair Work Ombudsman v Angel (No 2) [2026] FedCFamC2G 372.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with compliance notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. They also have a legal obligation to provide employees with payslips in the required format and timeframe. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to receive payslips. If an employee does not receive a payslip or believes their employer is not complying with workplace laws, they should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate AI goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/about-us/compliance-and-enforcement/litigation/2025-2026-litigation-outcomesWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →