Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 14 August 2023

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2023-08-15-polytrade-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
PTES 928 Pty Ltd
Penalty
$375,000
Employees affected
5
Awards cited
MA000047

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman secured $375,515 in penalties against Polytrade (now PT 349 Pty Ltd), PTES 928 Pty Ltd, and company owners Man Sang Chen and Pui Shan Ho. Five migrant workers employed at waste management facilities in Melbourne were underpaid a total of $194,249 between 2018 and 2019. The workers, who held protection and bridging visas, were paid a flat rate of $22 per hour, failing to account for overtime, shift work, weekend, or public holiday work. PTES 928 Pty Ltd acted as a labour provider supplying workers to Polytrade. Ms Ho also owns PTES 928 Pty Ltd.

What was decided

The Federal Court imposed penalties of $138,600 against Polytrade, $200,375 against PTES 928 Pty Ltd, and $27,720 and $8,820 against Mr Chen and Ms Ho respectively. The court found the conduct was a 'wantonly naïve' disregard of workplace obligations. PTES 928 Pty Ltd has back-paid the five workers and made further back-payments of $2.2 million to other underpaid workers. The Full Federal Court increased a penalty against Ms Ho from an earlier amount.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure all employees, including those on temporary visas, receive their full legal entitlements, including minimum wages, overtime, and penalty rates. Using labour hire arrangements does not absolve employers of responsibility for ensuring workers are paid correctly. Maintaining accurate records and complying with award obligations is crucial.

What it means for employees

Visa holders have the same workplace rights as Australian citizens and permanent residents. Employees should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they believe they have been underpaid or are unsure of their entitlements. Reporting concerns is encouraged, and protections are in place for those who do so.

underpaymentpenalty-ratescasual-conversiongeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationwage-theftsham-contractinglong-service-leave

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2023-media-releases/august-2023/20230815-polytrade-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases