Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2022-12-05-quickpoint-penalty-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Quickpoint Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $192,995
- Employees affected
- 2
What happened
Quickpoint Pty Ltd, formerly operating a café called 'Shimizu Harbour Town' in Perth, and its sole director, the Respondent, have been penalized by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after receiving a request for assistance from a worker. Quickpoint and the Respondent admitted to breaching record-keeping and pay slip laws by falsifying wage records and providing them to the Fair Work Ombudsman during an investigation. They pressured two employees to support their deception by claiming they were paid award rates, despite only receiving $15 to $16 per hour.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $168,415 penalty on Quickpoint Pty Ltd and a $24,580 penalty on the Respondent. The court found their conduct, including falsifying records and attempting to manipulate employees, was 'reprehensible'. The penalties are intended to deter similar behavior. The court noted the falsified records made it difficult for employees to discover they were being underpaid. The total penalty amount is $192,995.
What it means for employers
Employers must keep accurate wage records and be truthful during Fair Work Ombudsman investigations. Falsifying records and pressuring employees to provide false information carries significant penalties. The Fair Work Ombudsman prioritizes compliance in the fast food, restaurant, and café sector.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they are being underpaid or have concerns about their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Be aware of potential pressure from employers to provide false information.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/december-2022/20221205-quickpoint-penalty-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →