Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2022-09-12-darwin-food-precincts-report-media-release
At a glance
- Penalty
- $400,000
- Employees affected
- 479
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated 48 businesses in Darwin food precincts, including Darwin City, Casuarina, and Palmerston City. The investigation found 76% of businesses were non-compliant with workplace laws. Many businesses employed visa holders. The investigation focused on businesses with a history of non-compliance, anonymous tip-offs, or employing vulnerable workers. A total of 479 employees were underpaid, with $393,453 recovered in wages.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman recovered $393,453 in unpaid wages for 479 workers. Thirty-one businesses underpaid workers, and 10 failed to provide correct payslips and records. The most common breaches involved failing to pay penalty rates or casual loading, underpaying the minimum hourly rate, and failing to pay correct overtime. Thirty-two businesses received Compliance Notices, and 10 received Infringement Notices totaling $12,792. One business back-paid $94,687 to 15 employees.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with all wage laws. Businesses in the fast food, restaurant, and café sector are being closely monitored. Failure to pay penalty rates, minimum wages, or overtime can result in significant financial penalties and Compliance Notices. Employers should use available resources to ensure compliance.
What it means for employees
Employees, particularly visa holders and students, should seek help if they believe they have been underpaid. The Fair Work Ombudsman offers free advice and assistance, and visa holders can do so without fear of visa cancellation.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/september-2022/20220912-darwin-food-precincts-report-media-releaseSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections