Skip to main content
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 30 August 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-09-02-clrs-eu-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Community Living & Respite Services Inc (CLRS)
Penalty
$3,000,000
Employees affected
391

What happened

Community Living & Respite Services Inc (CLRS), a disability services provider operating in Echuca and Moama, New South Wales and Victoria, underpaid employees between 2015 and 2021. The underpayments occurred because CLRS failed to correctly implement an Equal Remuneration Order from 2012, which increased minimum wages in the social and disability services sector. CLRS self-reported the non-compliance to the Fair Work Ombudsman in 2021. The affected employees were primarily disability and aged care workers, including full-time, part-time, and casual staff. A total of 391 current and former employees were impacted.

What was decided

CLRS has back-paid employees a total of $3.17 million, including superannuation and goodwill payments. Individual payments ranged from $15 to $34,874. The Fair Work Ombudsman secured an Enforceable Undertaking (EU) from CLRS, noting their cooperation and commitment to rectifying the underpayments. The EU requires CLRS to notify staff of the underpayments, operate an enquiry line, and engage an independent auditor to assess compliance with workplace laws. The Fair Work Ombudsman emphasised the importance of employers staying informed about workplace laws.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure they are fully compliant with workplace laws, particularly when there are changes like the Equal Remuneration Order. Regularly review and update compliance processes to avoid underpayments and potential penalties. Seeking free advice and assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman is recommended.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their workplace entitlements and report any suspected underpayments to the Fair Work Ombudsman. The Fair Work Ombudsman provides free advice and assistance to both employers and employees.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationgeneral-protectionswage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/september-2022/20220902-clrs-eu-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases