The Australian Workers' Union (002N) v Cement Australia Pty Limited Trading AS Cement Australia & CFMEU (105N)
Citation: [2026] FWCFB 138
What happened
The Applicant appealed a Fair Work Commission Deputy President's decision. The Deputy President had considered whether the Applicant was a purported bargaining representative for employees of Cement Australia Pty Limited. Cement Australia is a company that produces cement. The Second Respondent was also involved in the matter.
What was decided
The Full Bench heard an appeal against a decision made on 20 February 2026. The Deputy President had previously considered whether the Applicant was a purported bargaining representative for employees of Cement Australia. The Full Bench's decision is not detailed in the provided text.
What it means for employers
The decision highlights the importance of ensuring proper representation when negotiating enterprise agreements. Employers should verify the legitimacy of any union claiming to represent their employees.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of their rights regarding union representation and enterprise bargaining processes. This decision may impact how unions can act as bargaining representatives.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwcfb138.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections