Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 January 2026

[2026] FWC 59

Citation: [2026] FWC 59

What happened

Adam Eales, a casual employee, worked as a Guest Service Agent at Airport Tourist Village Melbourne (ATVM), operated by RB Enterprises, from October 2023. RB Enterprises was transitioning ATVM from a caravan park to a hotel. On August 15, 2025, Eales inquired about his roster and was told there were budget issues and no further shifts for a few weeks. He then received a text message on August 19, 2025, stating his employment was terminated. Eales challenged the dismissal, claiming he was unfairly dismissed. RB Enterprises argued Eales was not entitled to unfair dismissal protections because he wasn't a regular casual employee.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed RB Enterprises’ objection that Mr Eales was not entitled to unfair dismissal protections. The Commission found that Mr Eales was dismissed, not resigned, from his position. The Commission found that RB Enterprises did not provide a valid reason for the dismissal, citing a lack of explanation for budget issues and the subsequent advertisement for a similar role. The Commission will now consider the factors outlined in s 387 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to determine if the dismissal was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable.

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc59.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases