Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 1 January 2026

Application by Sulaman Gharib

Citation: [2026] FWC 2245

What happened

The Fair Work Commission received an application from the Applicant. The application concerns an unfair deactivation remedy. The document references a previous decision, *Whittaker, Adrian v Total Harvesting Pty Ltd T/A Total Harvesting* [2018] FWC 1583. The document itself is a PDF and the content is not fully extractable from the provided text.

What was decided

The document describes the application by the Applicant as concerning an unfair deactivation remedy. The document states the case number is UDE2026/146. The document is a decision from the Fair Work Commission, dated 2025-12-31. The full reasoning and decision are not available in the provided text.

What it means for employers

The document does not provide specific implications for employers. It highlights a case involving an unfair deactivation remedy, suggesting employers should review their deactivation processes to ensure compliance with Fair Work principles.

What it means for employees

The document indicates that employees have recourse to the Fair Work Commission to address unfair deactivation remedies. Employees should seek legal advice if they believe they have been unfairly deactivated from their employment.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsunfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/application-by-sulaman-gharib-2026-fwc-2245

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases