Application by the Applicant
Citation: [2026] FWC 2245
What happened
The Fair Work Commission received an application from the Applicant. The application concerns an unfair deactivation remedy. The document references a previous decision, *Whittaker, Adrian v Total Harvesting Pty Ltd T/A Total Harvesting* [2018] FWC 1583. The document itself is a PDF and the content is not fully extractable from the provided text.
What was decided
The document describes the application by the Applicant as concerning an unfair deactivation remedy. The document states the case number is UDE2026/146. The document is a decision from the Fair Work Commission, dated 2025-12-31. The full reasoning and decision are not available in the provided text.
What it means for employers
The document does not provide specific implications for employers. It highlights a case involving an unfair deactivation remedy, suggesting employers should review their deactivation processes to ensure compliance with Fair Work principles.
What it means for employees
The document indicates that employees have recourse to the Fair Work Commission to address unfair deactivation remedies. Employees should seek legal advice if they believe they have been unfairly deactivated from their employment.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/application-by-sulaman-gharib-2026-fwc-2245Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections