Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

the Applicant v Amazon Web Services Australia Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 2187

What happened

the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission concerning an unfair dismissal claim against Amazon Web Services Australia Pty Ltd. The Commission considered whether the application could proceed, focusing on the Applicant’s income. The decision notes the Applicant’s high income.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission has dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. the Commissioner found that the Applicant’s income exceeded the threshold for jurisdiction in an unfair dismissal claim. The Commission stated, 'the applicant’s annual income exceeds the high income threshold, and therefore the application is not capable of being dealt with by the Commission.'

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the high-income threshold for unfair dismissal claims. Employees earning above this threshold may not be able to pursue a claim in the Fair Work Commission.

What it means for employees

Employees with a high annual income should be aware that they may not have standing to bring an unfair dismissal claim in the Fair Work Commission. They should seek legal advice to explore alternative options.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2187.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases