the Applicant v Blitz Refrigeration And Air Conditioning Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 2093
What happened
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission against Blitz Refrigeration And Air Conditioning Pty Ltd regarding an unfair dismissal claim. The company raised a jurisdictional objection, arguing the application was filed out of time. the Commissioner considered the timing of the application and whether an extension of time was required.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the jurisdictional objection raised by Blitz Refrigeration And Air Conditioning Pty Ltd. the Commissioner found the application was lodged within the prescribed time limit. Consequently, an extension of time was not necessary, and the unfair dismissal application will proceed. the Commissioner stated, 'application found to be within time – objection dismissed – extension of time not required – application to proceed.'
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of the time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. While the Commission can grant extensions of time, it is important to assess applications carefully and ensure compliance with procedural requirements.
What it means for employees
Employees should be mindful of the time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. Seeking legal advice promptly is recommended to ensure compliance with these deadlines.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2093.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →