Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

the Applicant v Satellite Office Solutions Pty Limited & Pepperstone Group Limited and Others

Citation: [2026] FWC 2068

What happened

the Applicant commenced work for Satellite Office Solutions Pty Limited, which is part of the Pepperstone Group Limited. He performed duties in the Philippines. The Applicant brought a claim to the Fair Work Commission. The central issue was whether he met the definition of an Australian-based employee for Fair Work purposes.

What was decided

the Commissioner found the Applicant was not an Australian-based employee. The decision stated that his contract was formed in the Philippines, and he performed his duties exclusively in the Philippines. Consequently, his claim was not able to proceed. The Commission did not award any penalty.

What it means for employers

Employers should carefully consider the location of contract formation and where work is performed when determining whether an employee is based in Australia for Fair Work purposes. This is particularly relevant for businesses with international operations.

What it means for employees

Employees working overseas, even for Australian companies, may not be covered by Australian workplace laws if their contract and work location are outside of Australia. It is important to understand the basis of your employment and applicable legal jurisdiction.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionssham-contracting

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2068.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases