Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

Application by CCR Group Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 2059

What happened

CCR Group Pty Ltd, a manufacturer, sought approval of an enterprise agreement. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) opposed the approval. The Commission considered whether employees genuinely agreed to the agreement, noting issues with the explanation of significant terms and the selection of the casual voting cohort.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission did not approve the enterprise agreement. Commissioner Crawford found that employees did not genuinely agree to the agreement. This was due to issues including a lack of explanation of key terms and problems with how the casual employee voting group was selected. The Commission did not accept undertakings provided to address these concerns. "issues with how casual voting cohort was selected"

What it means for employers

Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements must ensure employees fully understand the agreement's terms. This includes providing clear explanations of significant clauses. Careful consideration must be given to how employee groups are defined for voting purposes, particularly for casual employees.

What it means for employees

Employees should carefully review and understand any proposed enterprise agreement before voting. If there are aspects of the agreement that are unclear, employees should seek clarification from their union or employer.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2059.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases