Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union re Hilton Foods Australia —Heathwood,Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union re Hilton Foods Australia —Heathwood
Citation: [2026] FWC 1891
What happened
The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union applied for a regulated labour hire arrangement order concerning AWX Labour Hire Pty Ltd and Hilton Foods Australia Pty Ltd. The application relates to work performed at Hilton Foods Australia’s Heathwood, Queensland site. The Fair Work Commission was asked to consider the arrangement.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the regulated labour hire arrangement order. The Commissioner made the decision. The order applies to Hilton Foods Australia Pty Ltd and AWX Labour Hire Pty Ltd concerning work at the Heathwood site. The case numbers are LH2026/8 and LH2026/9.
What it means for employers
Employers using labour hire arrangements should review their practices to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The Commission can impose regulated labour hire arrangements where concerns arise regarding worker exploitation or unfair conditions.
What it means for employees
Employees working through labour hire companies may benefit from increased protections and improved conditions if a regulated labour hire arrangement is in place. This can provide greater job security and fairer treatment.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1891.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections