Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

the Applicant v Clean Freaks Co Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 1882

What happened

the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission regarding a dismissal. The Commission initiated a dismissal under section 587, due to a lack of prosecution of the case by the Applicant. Clean Freaks Co Pty Ltd is the respondent. Deputy President Easton heard the matter.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found the case was not prosecuted by the Applicant, leading to the dismissal under section 587. This section allows the Commission to dismiss a case when a party fails to actively pursue it.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure that all necessary steps are taken to actively participate in Fair Work Commission proceedings. Failure to do so can lead to a case being dismissed, even if there are underlying disputes.

What it means for employees

Employees who initiate proceedings in the Fair Work Commission must actively participate and pursue their case. Failure to do so, such as not responding to correspondence or attending hearings, can result in the dismissal of their claim.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredundancyunderpaymentsham-contractingmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1882.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases