Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

Mr Christian Turner v Infrabuild Trading Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 813

What happened

Mr Christian Turner brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning contraventions involving a dismissal. Infrabuild Trading Pty Ltd was the respondent. The Commission considered whether Mr Turner was dismissed and whether he was an employee. The Commissioner found that Mr Turner was an independent contractor, not an employee, and therefore not dismissed within the meaning of the Fair Work Act.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission rejected Mr Turner’s application. Commissioner Connolly found that Mr Turner was an independent contractor, not an employee. Because he was not an employee, he could not have been dismissed. The Commission therefore found that the application did not proceed.

What it means for employers

Employers should carefully review their contractor agreements to ensure they accurately reflect the working relationship. Misclassifying employees as independent contractors can have significant legal consequences.

What it means for employees

Workers should be aware of the distinction between employees and independent contractors. Misclassification can impact access to workplace protections and entitlements.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate AI goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionssham-contracting

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-christian-turner-v-infrabuild-trading-pty-ltd-2025-fwc-813

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases