Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v the Respondent & Vistage Australia Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 556

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with Vistage Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Vistage, in 2023. He made an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The application was filed out of time. the Applicant argued he experienced a medical condition that prevented him from lodging the application sooner. the Respondent, representing Vistage, appeared. the Commissioner considered whether to grant an extension of time.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted an extension of time for the Applicant to pursue his application. the Commissioner found exceptional circumstances existed due to the Applicant’s medical condition. The Commission stated, 'I am satisfied that the applicant has established exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of time'. The decision did not address the merits of the underlying dispute.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that the Fair Work Commission may grant extensions of time for applications, even when filed late, if exceptional circumstances are demonstrated. Medical conditions can be a factor in such considerations. It is important to respond to applications, even if they appear to be filed outside of standard timeframes.

What it means for employees

Employees facing time limitations for Fair Work applications should seek legal advice promptly. Demonstrating exceptional circumstances, such as a medical condition, may allow the Commission to grant an extension of time to pursue a claim.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsunfair-dismissalredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc556.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases