Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v Ojt 399 Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 3937

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with Ojt 399 Pty Ltd. The company applied to deal with contraventions involving his dismissal. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant was dismissed for the purposes of s 386(1) of the Fair Work Act.

What was decided

Deputy President Masson rejected the jurisdictional objection and found that the Applicant was dismissed within the meaning of s 386(1) of the Fair Work Act. The application was dismissed. The Deputy President stated, "the Applicant dismissed within the meaning of s 386(1) of the Fair Work Act."

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they accurately classify employee terminations to avoid jurisdictional challenges in Fair Work Commission proceedings. A termination can be considered a dismissal even if not formally labelled as such.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware that a termination can be considered a dismissal, even if the employer does not label it as such. This can impact their rights and entitlements under the Fair Work Act.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3937.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases