the Applicant v Revel Group Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 3840
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Revel Group Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant was dismissed, a requirement for an unfair dismissal claim under the Fair Work Act. The Deputy President had to determine if the Applicant’s employment ended in a way that constituted a dismissal.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission rejected a jurisdictional objection raised by Revel Group Pty Ltd. The Commission found that the Applicant was dismissed within the meaning of section 386(1) of the Fair Work Act. This means his application to pursue an unfair dismissal claim can proceed. The Deputy President stated, 'the Applicant was dismissed within the meaning of s 386(1) of the Fair Work Act.'
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully consider the nature of employment terminations. A termination may be deemed a dismissal even if not explicitly labelled as such, impacting an employee’s right to pursue an unfair dismissal claim.
What it means for employees
If you believe your employment has ended unfairly, it is important to understand that the way your employment ended is a key factor in determining if you can make an unfair dismissal claim. Even if you were not formally dismissed, the Fair Work Commission can still find a dismissal occurred.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3840.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections