the Applicant v Insight Integration Technology Pty. Limited & the Respondent
Citation: [2025] FWC 3715
What happened
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission seeking to have a contravention of the Fair Work Act addressed. He was previously dismissed from Insight Integration Technology Pty. Limited, a technology company, and the Respondent was also named as a respondent. The application was filed outside of the standard time limit.
What was decided
Deputy President Easton dismissed the Applicant’s application. The Commission found the circumstances for filing the application out of time were not exceptional, meaning there was no sufficient reason to extend the time limit. The decision references previous cases including *Stogiannidis v Victorian Frozen Foods Distributors Pty Ltd* and *Long v Keolis Downer T/A Yarra Trams* regarding the threshold for exceptional circumstances. As such, the application was not considered to have merit.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of strict time limits for filing applications in the Fair Work Commission. While extensions can be granted, the threshold for ‘exceptional circumstances’ is high and requires more than just a reasonable explanation for a delay.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be mindful of the time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. If an employee misses the deadline, they will need to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to have their application considered.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3715.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →