the Applicant v Department Of Education
Citation: [2025] FWC 3613
What happened
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission regarding an unfair dismissal. The Department of Education applied to have the matter dismissed under section 587 of the Fair Work Act, due to the Applicant failing to prosecute her claim. This means she did not actively pursue the case. Deputy President Easton heard the application.
What was decided
Deputy President Easton found that the Applicant had not prosecuted her claim. The Department of Education’s application to dismiss the proceeding was successful. The Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The decision states, 'the application is dismissed under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative for want of prosecution.'
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees actively participate in Fair Work proceedings. Failure to do so can result in a dismissal of the claim, even if there are underlying issues.
What it means for employees
Employees who lodge a claim with the Fair Work Commission must actively manage and pursue their case. Failing to do so, such as not responding to correspondence or attending hearings, can lead to the claim being dismissed.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3613.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →