the Applicant v Upper Ed Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 3565
What happened
the Applicant commenced an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Upper Ed Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission found that the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act. the Deputy President, Easton DP, dismissed the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. the Deputy President found the application was not made in accordance with the Act, and the fee was not paid or waived. The Commission did not provide reasons for the dismissal beyond this finding.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees follow the correct procedures when lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission, including paying the required application fee or having it waived.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be aware of the requirements for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission, including paying the application fee or obtaining a waiver, to ensure their application is valid.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3565.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections