Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v Epworth Hospital Richmond

Citation: [2025] FWC 3327

What happened

the Applicant, an employee, applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy. The application was lodged out of time. the Respondent was Epworth Hospital Richmond. the Commissioner heard the case.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found he did not establish exceptional circumstances to justify the late filing of his application. The decision refers to previous cases, including *Stogiannidis v Victorian Frozen Foods Distributors Pty Ltd* and *Neil Macleod v Multiplex Australasia Pty Ltd*, which outline the requirements for extending time limits in Fair Work applications.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that applications must be filed within specific timeframes. Late applications are difficult to pursue unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated. This reinforces the importance of timely responses to employee complaints and ensuring employees understand relevant deadlines.

What it means for employees

Employees need to be aware of the strict time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. If you miss a deadline, you need to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for the Commission to consider your application. Seek legal advice promptly if you believe you have a claim.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3327.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases