the Applicant v Chandler Macleod Group Limited & Fujitsu Australia Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 3177
What happened
the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission under section 365 of the Fair Work Act. He sought to deal with contraventions involving a dismissal. The respondents were Chandler Macleod Group Limited and Fujitsu Australia Ltd. The Commission found that the Applicant was not employed by either of the respondents.
What was decided
Deputy President dismissed the application. The Commission found that because the Applicant was not employed by either respondent, the application could not proceed. The decision states, 'application dismissed'.
What it means for employers
This decision highlights the importance of verifying employment status when dealing with Fair Work applications. Employers should ensure they accurately identify who is employed by their organisation to avoid potential legal challenges.
What it means for employees
Employees should confirm their employment status with the correct entity before initiating Fair Work applications. Incorrectly identifying the employer can lead to the dismissal of the application.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3177.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections