Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v Chandler Macleod Group Limited & Fujitsu Australia Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 3177

What happened

the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission under section 365 of the Fair Work Act. He sought to deal with contraventions involving a dismissal. The respondents were Chandler Macleod Group Limited and Fujitsu Australia Ltd. The Commission found that the Applicant was not employed by either of the respondents.

What was decided

Deputy President dismissed the application. The Commission found that because the Applicant was not employed by either respondent, the application could not proceed. The decision states, 'application dismissed'.

What it means for employers

This decision highlights the importance of verifying employment status when dealing with Fair Work applications. Employers should ensure they accurately identify who is employed by their organisation to avoid potential legal challenges.

What it means for employees

Employees should confirm their employment status with the correct entity before initiating Fair Work applications. Incorrectly identifying the employer can lead to the dismissal of the application.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsother

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3177.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases