Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v the Respondent

Citation: [2025] FWC 3059

What happened

the Applicant sought an order for costs against the Respondent. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the threshold for an order for costs under sections 375B and 611 of the Fair Work Act 2009 was met. The matter involved an application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal.

What was decided

Deputy President Boyce found the threshold under section 611 of the Fair Work Act 2009 was not met. However, the threshold under section 375B was met. The Commission exercised its discretion to award costs against the Respondent. The specific amount of the costs order was not detailed in the provided text.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the potential for cost orders against them if they fail to comply with workplace laws. The Commission can order costs against an employer even if the threshold for a costs order under s 611 is not met, if the threshold under s 375B is met.

What it means for employees

Employees who bring applications before the Fair Work Commission may be ordered to pay costs if their application is unsuccessful and they have acted unreasonably. However, the Commission has discretion in awarding costs.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionscosts

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3059.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases