the Applicant v Coynes Freight Management Group Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 2458
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Coynes Freight Management Group Pty Ltd. The Deputy President heard an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The decision references several previous cases including Stogiannidis v Victorian Frozen Foods Distributors Pty Ltd and Long v Keolis Downer T/A Yarra Trams.
What was decided
The document indicates a decision was made regarding an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Deputy President presided over the case. The document does not detail the specific decision or reasoning, only that it is a decision regarding an unfair dismissal remedy.
What it means for employers
The decision highlights the importance of adhering to Fair Work principles and legal precedent when managing employee relations. Employers should review their processes to ensure compliance with relevant legislation and case law.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should understand their rights and options for seeking remedies through the Fair Work Commission. This decision reinforces the Commission's role in addressing such claims.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2458.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections