Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v Aurum Poultry Employees Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 2072

What happened

the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Aurum Poultry Employees Pty Ltd. He filed the application 97 days after the relevant date. The Fair Work Commission considered whether to grant an extension of time for the application’s filing.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant's application. The Commission found that he did not provide sufficient reason for the delay in filing his application. Therefore, it did not grant an extension of time. Deputy President Clancy delivered the decision.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that applications for unfair dismissal must be filed within specific time limits. Failure to provide a reasonable explanation for delays in filing can result in the application being dismissed.

What it means for employees

Employees must file unfair dismissal applications promptly. If a delay is unavoidable, a reasonable explanation for the delay must be provided to the Fair Work Commission to seek an extension of time.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2072.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases