the Applicant v Collins Transport Group Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 196
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Collins Transport Group Pty Ltd. He brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The Commission considered whether the application was lodged within the required time frame, given the Applicant sought legal advice, contacted his former employer, and made inquiries in a different jurisdiction before lodging with the FWC. Deputy President Anderson heard the case.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant's application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal was lodged out of time. The Commission found that while the application was late, the Applicant had reasonable explanations for the delay, including seeking legal advice and contacting his former employer. The Commission stated, 'I consider that the applicant consulted a lawyer, contacted his former employer and made inquiries in the wrong jurisdiction.' The application was not dismissed for being out of time.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear communication with departing employees regarding their rights and the time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Prompt responses to employee inquiries can help avoid misunderstandings and potential delays in lodging applications.
What it means for employees
Employees should seek legal advice promptly if they believe their workplace rights have been breached. Understanding the time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission is important, and seeking advice can help ensure compliance.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc196.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →