the Applicant v the Respondent & Freo Group Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 1945
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Freo Group Pty Ltd in 2021. The company is in the leisure and entertainment industry. In 2024, the Applicant made a complaint about a workplace matter. Following this, he was dismissed. He applied to the Fair Work Commission seeking to have his dismissal declared unfair and to receive compensation. Deputy President Wright heard the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was not unfair. The Commission considered whether Freo Group Pty Ltd had a valid reason for the dismissal and whether the dismissal was harsh given the circumstances. The Commission noted that the Respondent had a genuine belief that the Applicant’s performance was unsatisfactory. The Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they have a valid reason for dismissing employees and follow a fair process. A genuine belief in unsatisfactory performance is not sufficient without supporting evidence and opportunities for improvement. Documenting performance concerns and providing clear feedback is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek legal advice and consider lodging an application with the Fair Work Commission. The Commission will assess whether the dismissal was harsh given the circumstances.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1945.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →