the Applicant v Flemington Child Care Co-operative Limited
Citation: [2025] FWC 1918
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. She filed the application out of time. Flemington Child Care Co-operative Limited did not oppose the application but argued it should be dismissed because the Applicant did not establish exceptional circumstances to justify an extension of time. The Fair Work Commission considered whether exceptional circumstances existed to allow the application to proceed.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission refused to extend the time for the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. the Commissioner found the Applicant did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances. She stated, “I am not persuaded that the Applicant has established exceptional circumstances sufficient to warrant an extension of time.” Consequently, the application was dismissed. The Commission cited previous decisions, including *Stogiannidis v Victorian Frozen Foods Distributors Pty Ltd*, in its reasoning.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that applications filed outside the standard time limits are unlikely to be accepted unless the applicant can demonstrate exceptional circumstances. This highlights the importance of timely responses to employee concerns and ensuring compliance with Fair Work Act deadlines.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be aware of the strict time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. If you miss the deadline, you need to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for an extension to be granted. Seek legal advice promptly if you believe you have grounds for an application.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1918.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →