the Applicant v the Respondent (Restaurant Manager), McDonald's
Citation: [2025] FWC 1912
What happened
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission seeking an unfair dismissal remedy from McDonald’s. The Respondent was the restaurant manager. The Commission initiated the dismissal under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found the application had no reasonable prospects of success.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy against McDonald’s. the Commissioner found the application had no reasonable prospects of success, and the Commission initiated the dismissal.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure that dismissal processes are compliant with the Fair Work Act and that decisions to dismiss employees are carefully considered and documented. The Commission can initiate a dismissal under section 587(1)(c) if an application has no reasonable prospects of success.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that applications to the Fair Work Commission must have reasonable prospects of success. If an application is deemed to have no reasonable prospects, it can be dismissed by the Commission.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1912.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →