the Applicant v Boundary Lane Pty Ltd
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Boundary Lane Pty Ltd, a company operating a charter business. His role involved operating and maintaining vessels. He brought an unfair dismissal claim. The Fair Work Commission needed to determine if the Applicant was covered by a modern award to proceed with the claim.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant was not covered by a modern award. The Commission applied the ‘principal purpose’ test to determine this. The test considers the primary purpose of the employee’s role. The Commission decided the Applicant’s primary purpose was operating and maintaining vessels for the charter business. Therefore, the claim was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, meaning the Commission lacked the authority to hear it.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully consider the primary purpose of roles when determining whether an employee is covered by a modern award. This assessment is crucial for ensuring compliance and avoiding potential disputes.
What it means for employees
Employees should understand that their employment is governed by a modern award if their primary job duties align with the award’s coverage. If unsure, seek advice to confirm award coverage.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.