the Applicant v Elite1 Group Pty Ltd
What happened
the Applicant commenced work with Elite1 Group Pty Ltd. He subsequently filed an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The application was lodged out of time, requiring him to seek relief under section 394(3) of the Fair Work Act. The Commission needed to consider whether there were sufficient grounds to grant relief from the time limit.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy, which was lodged outside the standard time limit. The Commission found that there were sufficient reasons to grant relief from the time limit under section 394(3). the Commissioner stated, 'I am satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to grant relief from the strict time limit'. The decision does not detail the substantive unfair dismissal claim itself.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of the possibility of applications being lodged outside of standard time limits. They should be prepared to address applications seeking relief from time limits under section 394(3) of the Fair Work Act. This requires careful consideration of the reasons for the delay and whether there are sufficient grounds to grant relief.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed but missed the standard time limit for lodging a claim should seek legal advice promptly. It may be possible to apply for relief from the time limit under section 394(3) of the Fair Work Act, but this requires demonstrating sufficient grounds for the delay.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.