Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2024

the Applicant v The Trustee For Gammon Family Trust

Citation: [2025] FWC 1823

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with The Trustee For Gammon Family Trust, trading as Gammon Plating, in 2021. She was dismissed in 2023. the Applicant brought an unfair dismissal claim. The Commission notes that the Respondent did not appear.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission has found the Applicant’s dismissal was unfair. the Commissioner considered the Respondent’s failure to appear and the lack of evidence presented. The Commission ordered the Respondent to reinstate the Applicant and pay her compensation. The Commission stated, 'the Respondent did not appear and did not file any evidence. I have therefore had to make findings based on the evidence of the Applicant.'

What it means for employers

Employers must attend Fair Work Commission hearings, or risk adverse findings due to their absence. Failure to present evidence can lead to decisions being made based solely on the employee’s evidence.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should consider lodging a claim with the Fair Work Commission. A lack of response from the employer can strengthen an employee’s case.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1823.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases