Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v Tully Nursing Home

Citation: [2025] FWC 1772

What happened

the Applicant sought a remedy for unfair dismissal from Tully Nursing Home. She filed her application out of time. The Fair Work Commission considered whether there were exceptional circumstances that would allow the application to proceed despite the delay. the Deputy President considered the reasons for the delay and whether they were exceptional.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for unfair dismissal. the Deputy President found that the reasons for the delay in filing the application were not exceptional. Therefore, the application was not able to proceed. The Commission referred to a previous decision, *Stogiannidis v Victorian Frozen Foods Distributors Pty Ltd*, which outlines the requirements for exceptional circumstances.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that applications filed outside the relevant time limits are generally not considered. However, there is a possibility of an application being considered if exceptional circumstances can be demonstrated. The threshold for demonstrating exceptional circumstances is high.

What it means for employees

Employees must file applications to the Fair Work Commission within the prescribed time limits. If an employee misses the deadline, they need to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for the application to be considered. Seeking legal advice promptly is crucial if an employee believes they have grounds for an application.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1772.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases