Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2024

the Applicant v Queensland Railways Institute Inc

Citation: [2025] FWC 1654

What happened

the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission regarding a dismissal dispute. The Commission had to consider whether to allow an extension of time for her application. The case was heard by Commissioner McKinnon.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission considered whether to grant an extension of time for the Applicant’s application. The decision does not detail the reasons for the decision or the outcome regarding the extension of time. The document indicates the case number is C2025/2801 and the decision is [2025] FWC 1654.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission and ensure they adhere to these deadlines. Failure to do so can result in applications being delayed or rejected.

What it means for employees

Employees should be mindful of the time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Seeking legal advice promptly is important if you believe your workplace rights have been breached.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsunfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1654.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases