the Applicant v Sharp N Stylish
Citation: [2024] FWC 3477
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Sharp N Stylish, a hair salon, in 2021. She made an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The application was filed out of time. The Commission needed to decide if it could proceed with the application despite it being filed late.
What was decided
the Commissioner found the application was filed out of time. the Applicant provided reasons for the delay, but the Commissioner considered these insufficient to justify proceeding with the application. the Commissioner upheld the jurisdictional objection and dismissed the application. As stated in the decision, 'the applicant has not satisfied me that she has established adequate reasons for the delay in filing her application'.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of strict time limits for Fair Work applications. While extensions can be sought, applicants must provide compelling reasons for any delay. Failure to do so can result in the application being dismissed.
What it means for employees
Employees must file Fair Work applications within the prescribed time limits. If a delay is unavoidable, it's crucial to have strong reasons for the delay and seek an extension promptly. Failure to do so may prevent the application from being heard.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc3477.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections