Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2023

Megan Ryan v Sharp N Stylish

Citation: [2024] FWC 3477

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with Sharp N Stylish, a hair salon, in 2021. She made an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning a dismissal. The application was filed out of time. The Commission needed to decide if it could proceed with the application despite it being filed late.

What was decided

the Commissioner found the application was filed out of time. the Applicant provided reasons for the delay, but the Commissioner considered these insufficient to justify proceeding with the application. the Commissioner upheld the jurisdictional objection and dismissed the application. As stated in the decision, 'the applicant has not satisfied me that she has established adequate reasons for the delay in filing her application'.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of strict time limits for Fair Work applications. While extensions can be sought, applicants must provide compelling reasons for any delay. Failure to do so can result in the application being dismissed.

What it means for employees

Employees must file Fair Work applications within the prescribed time limits. If a delay is unavoidable, it's crucial to have strong reasons for the delay and seek an extension promptly. Failure to do so may prevent the application from being heard.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc3477.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases