the Applicant v McDonald's Australia Limited
Citation: [2024] FWC 3225
At a glance
- Penalty
- $16,671
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with a McDonald's restaurant in 2021. She was dismissed in November 2023. the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission seeking to have the dismissal declared unfair and to receive compensation. McDonald’s Australia Limited contested the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was unfair. the Commissioner considered the context of the dismissal, including the Applicant's performance and the Respondent’s reasons for termination. The Commission stated, 'I consider that the dismissal was harsh given the context of the employee’s conduct and the employer’s response.' The Commission ordered compensation of $16,670.80. The Commission did not award any wage loss.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure dismissal processes are fair and consider the context of an employee's conduct before termination. A thorough investigation and a reasonable response to an employee's actions are crucial to avoid unfair dismissal claims. The decision highlights the importance of balancing disciplinary action with the employee's overall performance and circumstances.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should consider lodging an application with the Fair Work Commission. The Commission will assess the fairness of the dismissal based on the circumstances and the Respondent’s actions.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc3225.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections