the Applicant v Kestrel Coal Pty Limited
Citation: [2024] FWC 2409
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Kestrel Coal Pty Limited. She applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy. The company raised a jurisdictional objection, arguing the application was not properly filed. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the application was lodged within the relevant time limit.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered the jurisdictional objection raised by Kestrel Coal Pty Limited. the Commissioner found the application was not lodged within the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the Commission found it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal application. The application was dismissed on this basis. The Commission did not consider the merits of the dismissal.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they are aware of the strict time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. Failure to do so can result in an application being dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, preventing a proper assessment of the claim.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be mindful of the time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. Missing these deadlines can prevent them from having their claims heard.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc2409.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →