the Applicant v Swansea Community Cottage Inc
Citation: [2024] FWC 1950
What happened
the Applicant brought a general protections application against Swansea Community Cottage Inc. He alleged he was dismissed. The Fair Work Commission had to consider whether the application was filed within the required time limit. The relevant time limit is generally 21 days from the date of the allegedly unfair action, or continuously, if that is not possible. the Applicant filed his application outside this time.
What was decided
Deputy President Saunders dismissed the Applicant’s application. The Commission found he did not file his application within the 21-day time limit. It also found there were no exceptional circumstances to justify an extension of time. As such, the application was not considered further. Deputy President Saunders stated, “there is no basis for the Commission to exercise its discretion to hear the application”.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of the strict time limits for filing general protections applications. This is typically 21 days from the date of the alleged adverse action. If an employee misses this deadline, it is difficult to have the application heard, even if there are mitigating factors.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be aware of the 21-day time limit for filing general protections applications. If an employee believes they have been unfairly treated, they should seek legal advice promptly. Missing the deadline can prevent them from pursuing a claim.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc1950.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections