FairWork Mate

Sham Contracting in Australia: How to Tell If You're Really an Employee (2026)

|7 min read

Sham contracting is when an employer disguises employment as independent contracting to avoid paying entitlements. Learn the multi-factor test, penalties (up to $469,500), how to report it, your entitlements if reclassified, and the new employee-like worker reforms.

What is sham contracting?

Sham contracting occurs when an employer misrepresents an employment relationship as an independent contracting arrangement. The worker is engaged as a 'contractor' — often required to have an ABN and submit invoices — but the reality of the working arrangement is that of an employee. The employer does this to avoid paying employee entitlements such as superannuation, paid leave (annual leave, personal/carer's leave, long service leave), minimum wage rates, penalty rates, redundancy pay, notice of termination, and workers compensation insurance premiums. Sham contracting is illegal under the Fair Work Act 2009. Sections 357-359 of the Act prohibit employers from misrepresenting employment as independent contracting, dismissing or threatening to dismiss an employee in order to re-engage them as a contractor, and knowingly making false statements to persuade an employee to become a contractor. The practice is widespread in certain industries including construction, transport and delivery, cleaning, IT, hospitality, and the gig economy. The Fair Work Ombudsman has made sham contracting a compliance priority, conducting regular audits and investigations. If you are working under contractor arrangements but suspect you are really an employee, understanding the legal test for employment is critical to knowing your rights.

The multi-factor test: employee or contractor?

Courts and the Fair Work Commission use a multi-factor test to determine whether a worker is genuinely an independent contractor or is actually an employee. Following the High Court decisions in Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022), the primary focus is on the terms of the written contract, provided the contract is not a sham. Key factors include: Control — does the employer control how, when, and where the work is done? An employee is subject to the employer's direction; a contractor controls their own methods. Tools and equipment — does the worker provide their own tools, vehicle, and equipment, or does the employer provide them? Financial risk — does the worker bear financial risk (ability to profit or make a loss), or are they paid a set rate? Delegation — can the worker delegate or subcontract the work to someone else, or must they perform it personally? Integration — is the worker integrated into the employer's business (wearing uniforms, using company email, attending meetings), or operating independently? Exclusivity — does the worker work for multiple clients, or exclusively for one business? No single factor is determinative. The totality of the relationship is assessed.

Penalties for sham contracting

The penalties for sham contracting under the Fair Work Act are severe. Section 357 makes it unlawful for an employer to represent to an employee that their contract of employment is a contract for services (independent contracting). For each contravention, the maximum penalty is 60 penalty units for an individual — which at the current penalty unit value of $313 amounts to $18,780 per contravention — and 300 penalty units ($93,900) for a body corporate. However, under the serious contraventions regime introduced by the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Act 2017, if the contravention is deliberate and part of a systematic pattern, penalties increase to up to 600 penalty units for an individual ($187,800) and 3,000 penalty units for a body corporate ($939,000). In practice, courts have imposed penalties in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for systematic sham contracting across multiple workers. Beyond penalties, an employer found to have engaged in sham contracting must pay all outstanding employee entitlements — including back pay at the correct award rate, superannuation at 12%, accrued annual leave, personal leave, and any other entitlements the worker would have received as an employee. These liabilities can extend back six years under the limitation period.

Your entitlements if reclassified as an employee

If you are reclassified from an independent contractor to an employee — whether through a Fair Work complaint, court order, or ATO determination — you become entitled to all the employee entitlements you were denied during the period of sham contracting. This includes back pay for the difference between what you were paid and the minimum award rate (including penalty rates, overtime, and allowances you should have received), superannuation at 12% of OTE for the entire period, accrued but untaken annual leave (typically 4 weeks per year of service), accrued personal/carer's leave (10 days per year), long service leave if the period was long enough, redundancy pay if your employment ended in circumstances that would constitute redundancy, and notice of termination entitlements. The financial exposure for employers can be enormous. For a worker misclassified for three years at a rate below the award minimum, the combined back pay, super, leave accruals, and interest could amount to tens of thousands of dollars. The ATO will also pursue the employer for unpaid PAYG withholding tax, SG charge (including interest and penalties), and payroll tax. Workers can use our Back Pay Calculator and Superannuation Calculator to estimate the value of their potential claim.

Recent cases and enforcement

Recent years have seen significant enforcement activity around sham contracting. The Fair Work Ombudsman has brought successful prosecutions against businesses in cleaning, food delivery, construction, and transport. In 2023, the Federal Circuit and Family Court penalised a Melbourne cleaning company $197,000 for sham contracting arrangements affecting 11 cleaners who were required to have ABNs but worked set rosters, wore uniforms, and used company equipment. The ATO has also ramped up compliance activity, conducting employer reviews and issuing SG charge assessments for workers incorrectly classified as contractors. The ATO's Taxable Payments Annual Report (TPAR) system helps identify industries with high contractor usage for targeted audits. The construction, courier, cleaning, and IT sectors face particular scrutiny. In the gig economy, platforms like Uber, Deliveroo, and others have faced challenges to their contractor model. While the High Court's Personnel Contracting decision clarified that the written contract is the starting point for analysis, this has not ended the debate — particularly where contracts do not reflect the practical reality of the arrangement. The government's employee-like worker reforms are set to provide additional protections for gig workers and others in contractor-like arrangements.

New employee-like worker reforms

The Australian Government has introduced reforms to address the gap between traditional employment and independent contracting, particularly for gig economy workers. Under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023, the Fair Work Commission gained powers to set minimum standards for 'employee-like' workers — those who are technically independent contractors but who have little genuine independence or bargaining power. These reforms target workers in the gig economy (ride-share drivers, food delivery riders, care workers on platforms) who are engaged as contractors but who cannot set their own prices, have limited ability to delegate work, and earn below or around the median employee wage. The FWC can now make 'minimum standards orders' setting minimum pay rates, minimum engagement periods, and other conditions for employee-like workers. The reforms also introduced a new definition of employment that prioritises the real substance and practical reality of the working relationship over contractual labels. This means that even if a contract says 'independent contractor,' the relationship can be assessed based on how it actually operates. Additionally, the reforms closed a loophole by preventing employers from using labour hire arrangements to undercut enterprise agreement rates — the 'same job, same pay' provisions. These changes represent the most significant shift in Australian contractor law in decades.

How to report sham contracting

If you believe you are a victim of sham contracting, there are several avenues for reporting and seeking redress. You can lodge a complaint with the Fair Work Ombudsman online at fairwork.gov.au or by calling 13 13 94. The FWO investigates complaints about misclassification and can take enforcement action against employers, including seeking penalties and ordering back payment of entitlements. For the superannuation component, report unpaid super to the ATO online or by calling 13 10 20. The ATO can issue SG charge assessments and has strong powers to recover unpaid super. If you are a member of a union, your union can provide advice, representation, and may pursue the matter on your behalf. Some unions have dedicated sham contracting units, particularly in construction (CFMEU) and transport (TWU). You can also seek legal advice from a private employment lawyer or a community legal centre. Many employment lawyers offer free initial consultations, and community legal centres provide free legal advice to eligible individuals. Before reporting, gather evidence: your contract, invoices, communications with the employer, records of hours worked, evidence of control (rosters, direction, uniforms), and anything showing the reality of your working arrangement. This documentation strengthens your case significantly.

General information and estimates only — not legal, financial, or tax advice. Always verify with the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified professional.