Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 25 March 2026

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2026-03-26-warwick-institute-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$23,365
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000173

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Warwick Institute of Australia Pty Ltd, its director Charles Shiao, and former finance manager Xiaowen ‘Eva’ Xu. They are accused of allegedly requiring a Brazilian national, employed as a marketing officer in Brisbane between July 2019 and February 2022, to repay over $23,365 through a cashback scheme. The worker was initially employed casually, then full-time on a subclass 482 visa with a salary of $65,000. The allegations include requiring the worker to pay cash to Mr Shiao for visa sponsorship expenses and making further cash payments to the institute. The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges these payments benefited the institute and its director.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against Warwick Institute of Australia, Charles Shiao, and Xiaowen Xu for alleged breaches of workplace laws. The company faces penalties of up to $66,600 per contravention, while Shiao and Xu face penalties of up to $6,600 each. The court is also expected to order the company to repay the cashback payments (plus interest) to the worker. A directions hearing is scheduled for June 10, 2026. The investigation began after the worker requested assistance.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly those sponsoring migrant workers, must ensure employees receive their lawful entitlements and are not required to make repayments. Cashback schemes are considered unlawful and exploitative. Visa holders are entitled to the same protections as Australian citizens.

What it means for employees

Visa holders should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they believe their workplace rights have been violated. The Fair Work Ombudsman offers protections for visa holders who report alleged breaches.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionssham-contractingvisa-holderswage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2026-media-releases/march-2026/20260326-warwick-institute-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases