Victoria Work From Home Law 2026: 2 Days a Week Becomes a Right
Victoria is introducing Australia's first state WFH law — 2 days a week from September 2026. Plus the Westpac ruling, Clerks Award case, and what it all means for your right to work from home.
Victoria is making work from home a legal right — what's happening?
The Victorian Government under Premier Jacinta Allan has announced Australia's first state-level work from home legislation. Under the proposed law, any employee in Victoria whose role can "reasonably" be performed from home will have the legal right to work from home for at least two days per week. This is a standalone Victorian initiative, separate from the federal Fair Work Act, and goes significantly further than the existing federal right to request flexible work under section 65. The legislation is expected to take effect on 1 September 2026 for businesses with 15 or more employees, with small businesses (fewer than 15 employees) given until 1 July 2027 to comply. Premier Allan has stated there will be no small business exemption: "If you can work from home for a small business, you deserve the same rights as someone working for a big bank." The government has cited savings of $110 per week ($5,308 per year) per worker from reduced commuting costs as one of the policy justifications.
How will the Victorian WFH law work in practice?
The Victorian law creates a presumed right to work from home two days per week — meaning the default is that eligible employees can work remotely unless their employer can demonstrate the role genuinely cannot be performed from home. This is fundamentally different from the federal system, where employees must request flexible work and meet qualifying criteria (such as being a carer or parent). Under Victoria's proposal, all employees whose roles can reasonably be done remotely are covered, regardless of personal circumstances. Employers who want to refuse must show the role requires physical presence — not simply that they prefer in-office attendance. Disputes will be handled by the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC) for conciliation, with unresolved cases going to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). The government opened consultation through the Engage Victoria portal in August 2025, with industry roundtables running through September 2025 and the legislation expected to be introduced in 2026.
The Westpac ruling: the case that changed everything
In October 2025, the Fair Work Commission issued a landmark ruling that sent shockwaves through corporate Australia. A Sydney-based Westpac mortgage team worker requested full-time work from home to handle school pick-ups for her children. Westpac refused, citing its return-to-office policy. Fair Work Deputy President Tom Roberts sided with the employee, finding that Westpac had failed to establish reasonable business grounds for its refusal. The ruling noted that her work could be "performed completely remotely," that she had been working from home successfully for years with deadlines "met or exceeded," and that "a loss of productivity or efficiency or a negative impact on customer service has not materialised." The decision sent a "clear message" to employers that blanket return-to-office mandates without evidence-based reasoning will not stand up to scrutiny. This was not the only ruling — in Kent Aoyama v FLSA Holdings, the FWC found the employer "had not provided compelling proof" of any material impact, and in Anthony May v Paper Australia, the refusal was found "not based on reasonable business grounds." The message is consistent: generic HR answers are no longer enough.
The Clerks Award WFH case: could 1.8 million workers get WFH rights?
In a potentially even bigger development, the Australian Services Union (ASU) has applied to the Fair Work Commission to insert a work-from-home term into the Clerks Private Sector Award. This award covers approximately 1.8 million clerical and administrative workers across Australia — roughly three-quarters of whom are women. The proposed clause would create a presumed right to work from home if reasonably requested. If an employer wants to refuse, they would need to give 26 weeks (six months) notice before enforcing a return to office. The ASU has described the move as designed to "disrupt the push back to office." A survey of 600 clerical workers found 90% currently work from home at least part-time, and over 95% rated remote work as "very" or "extremely" important. The FWC started final hearings in September 2025, with submissions closed and a decision still pending as of March 2026. If successful, this would create award-level WFH rights for the largest single group of workers in Australia — without needing new legislation.
What about return-to-office mandates — are they legal?
Yes, return-to-office mandates can still be lawful — but the bar has risen significantly. In the PaperCut Software case (June 2025), a Melbourne software engineer was fired for refusing to return to the office. The FWC found PaperCut's return-to-office mandate was a lawful direction and the dismissal was not unfair. The key difference? PaperCut could demonstrate genuine business reasons for requiring in-person attendance. This shows the law cuts both ways. Employers with legitimate, evidence-based reasons for requiring office attendance — such as collaborative work that genuinely cannot be done remotely, client-facing requirements, or equipment access — can still mandate office presence. But employers who simply prefer workers to be visible in the office, without substantive evidence that remote work harms productivity or operations, face increasing legal risk. The FWC has made clear that "generic and blanket HR answers are not sufficient alone to establish a reasonable business ground for refusing a request." If you have been ordered back to the office, check whether your employer has actually addressed your specific role and circumstances.
Constitutional questions: can Victoria actually do this?
Legal commentators have flagged potential constitutional challenges to Victoria's proposed WFH legislation. Under the Australian Constitution, workplace relations is generally a Commonwealth power, exercised through the Fair Work Act. Victoria referred its industrial relations powers to the Commonwealth in 2009, meaning the federal system covers most Victorian private sector workers. So how can Victoria legislate on working arrangements? The most likely approach is to frame the legislation under the state's powers relating to health and safety or equal opportunity — areas that remain within state jurisdiction — rather than as industrial relations law. This is similar to how states regulate discrimination in the workplace through their own equal opportunity acts. However, if the legislation is seen as directly regulating employment conditions (rather than addressing health, safety, or discrimination), it could face a constitutional challenge from employer groups. The Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry has called for careful implementation. Whatever happens, the federal flexible work rights under section 65 will continue to operate as a floor — the Victorian law would sit on top as an additional protection.
What should you do right now?
If you are a Victorian employee wanting to work from home, you do not need to wait for the state legislation. You already have rights under the federal Fair Work Act. If you meet the qualifying criteria under section 65 (parent of a school-age child, carer, person with disability, 55+, experiencing family violence, or pregnant), you can make a formal written request to your employer today. Your employer must respond within 21 days and genuinely try to accommodate your request. If they refuse, you can take the matter to the Fair Work Commission, which can order your employer to grant the request — as the Westpac ruling demonstrated. Even if you don't meet the section 65 criteria, start the conversation with your manager. Frame your request around business outcomes: explain how you will maintain productivity, stay available for meetings, and handle any role requirements that need physical presence. Document everything in writing. If the Victorian legislation passes as announced, the right to two days per week WFH will apply from 1 September 2026 for larger employers, giving employees a much broader entitlement that does not depend on personal qualifying circumstances.
Try these free tools
Official resources
General information and estimates only — not legal, financial, or tax advice. Always verify with the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified professional.
Related articles
Enterprise agreements and Modern Awards both set workplace conditions, but they work differently. Learn the BOOT test, how EAs are made, zombie agreements, and how to check which applies to you.
National Employment Standards (NES) — Complete Summary of Your 11 RightsThe NES gives every Australian employee 11 minimum workplace rights. Here is a plain-English summary of each entitlement — maximum hours, leave, flexible arrangements, termination, and more.
Right to Disconnect Australia — What the New Law Means for YouAustralia's right to disconnect law lets employees refuse unreasonable out-of-hours contact. Learn who it covers, what counts as unreasonable, and how the FWC enforces it.