Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2025-10-02-armstrong-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Cruise Control Australia Parking Sydney
- Penalty
- $2,498
- Employees affected
- 1
- Awards cited
- MA000213
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Respondent, who owns and operates 'Cruise Control Australia Parking Sydney', a valet parking service in Sydney. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice to the Respondent in May 2024 after believing he underpaid a 54-year-old casual car parking officer between August and October 2023. The alleged underpayment related to unpaid penalty rates for weekend and overtime work under the Car Parking Award 2020.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is taking the Respondent to court for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice, which required him to calculate and back-pay the worker’s entitlements. The amount allegedly owing was $2,498. The FWO is seeking a penalty of up to $18,780 and an order for the Respondent to comply with the notice, including paying the alleged amount plus superannuation and interest. A hearing is scheduled for October 7, 2025.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in court action, penalties, and orders to back-pay entitlements. Employers should review their payroll practices to ensure compliance with relevant awards and legislation.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are concerned about their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. The Fair Work Ombudsman provides resources and support for employees to understand their rights and obligations.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/october-2025/20251002-armstrong-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →