Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2025-01-07-procraft-group-penalty-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Procraft Group
- Penalty
- $20,553
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman secured penalties and back-pay orders against Procraft Group Pty Ltd, a residential building and construction company based in Melbourne, and its sole director, Bradley Busuttil. The company failed to comply with a Compliance Notice regarding unpaid entitlements to a full-time carpenter employed between February and December 2021. The carpenter was owed accrued but untaken annual leave entitlements. A Fair Work Inspector issued the Compliance Notice in September 2022.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $13,320 penalty against Procraft Group and a $2,664 penalty against Bradley Busuttil. The company must also back-pay the carpenter $4,569 plus interest. Judge Janine Young found the failure to comply with the Compliance Notice was deliberate and serious, demonstrating a disregard for obligations under the Fair Work Act. The penalties are intended to deter future non-compliance. The Fair Work Ombudsman emphasised the importance of acting on Compliance Notices and protecting employee wages.
What it means for employers
Employers must act promptly and correctly on Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in substantial penalties and back-pay orders. The building and construction industry is a priority area for the FWO, so employers in this sector should ensure they are meeting their obligations.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they are owed unpaid entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. The FWO offers resources and courses to help employers understand Compliance Notices, and employees can seek information from their employer or union.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/january-2025/20250107-procraft-group-penalty-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections