Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 29 October 2024

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2024-10-30-gilling-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Benaya Building Group
Penalty
$4,151
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000123

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has taken legal action against the Respondent, the sole trader of Benaya Building Group in Melbourne. A young apprentice carpenter, aged 16 to 17, worked for the Respondent between January 2021 and February 2022. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in July 2023, alleging the Respondent underpaid the worker minimum wages, overtime, and annual leave entitlements. The worker was engaged in a first-year school-based apprenticeship.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges the Respondent failed to comply with the Compliance Notice, which required him to back-pay the worker’s entitlements, totaling $4,151. The FWO is seeking a penalty of up to $9,390 against the Respondent, plus an order for him to pay the outstanding amount, superannuation, and interest. A hearing is scheduled for November 4, 2024, in the Federal Circuit and Family Court.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly in the building and construction industry, must ensure they comply with workplace laws and pay employees all entitlements. Failure to do so, especially concerning young and vulnerable workers, can result in significant penalties and court action. Responding appropriately to Compliance Notices is crucial.

What it means for employees

Employees, especially young workers and apprentices, should be aware of their rights and entitlements. If they have concerns about their pay or entitlements, they should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesannual-leaveapprenticesyoung-workerscompliancegeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/october-2024/20241030-gilling-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases