Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-10-17-gogikar-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Navaneeth Gogikar
- Penalty
- $12,600
- Employees affected
- 3
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Respondent, the former operator of a United Petroleum outlet in Sunnybank Hills, Brisbane. This action follows an investigation that began in 2020. It is alleged that the Respondent provided false employment records and payslips to a Fair Work Inspector, showing different rates of pay than what was actually paid to a young Indian international student. He is also accused of failing to keep proper records and issue payslips for three international students employed as console operators between 2019 and 2021.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against the Respondent for allegedly falsifying employment records and failing to keep proper records. The Acting Fair Work Ombudsman Michael Campbell stated that this conduct is unacceptable. The Respondent faces penalties of up to $13,320 per contravention. A directions hearing is scheduled for January 2025 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court in Brisbane. This case is part of a broader pattern of FWO action against United Petroleum outlets.
What it means for employers
Employers must maintain accurate employment records and provide employees with correct payslips. Failing to do so, and deliberately falsifying records, can result in significant penalties. The Fair Work Ombudsman prioritises protecting young and migrant workers, and will take legal action against employers who fail to comply with workplace laws.
What it means for employees
Visa holder workers have the same workplace rights as other employees. If you suspect your employer is not paying you correctly or keeping proper records, you should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Interpreter services are available.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/october-2024/20241017-gogikar-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →