Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 16 October 2024

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2024-10-17-gogikar-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$12,600
Employees affected
3

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Navaneeth Gogikar, the former operator of a United Petroleum outlet in Sunnybank Hills, Brisbane. This action follows an investigation that began in 2020. It is alleged that Mr. Gogikar provided false employment records and payslips to a Fair Work Inspector, showing different rates of pay than what was actually paid to a young Indian international student. He is also accused of failing to keep proper records and issue payslips for three international students employed as console operators between 2019 and 2021.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against Mr. Gogikar for allegedly falsifying employment records and failing to keep proper records. Acting Fair Work Ombudsman Michael Campbell stated that this conduct is unacceptable. Mr. Gogikar faces penalties of up to $13,320 per contravention. A directions hearing is scheduled for January 2025 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court in Brisbane. This case is part of a broader pattern of FWO action against United Petroleum outlets.

What it means for employers

Employers must maintain accurate employment records and provide employees with correct payslips. Failing to do so, and deliberately falsifying records, can result in significant penalties. The Fair Work Ombudsman prioritises protecting young and migrant workers, and will take legal action against employers who fail to comply with workplace laws.

What it means for employees

Visa holder workers have the same workplace rights as other employees. If you suspect your employer is not paying you correctly or keeping proper records, you should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Interpreter services are available.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionsmisclassificationwage-theftpenalty-ratespublic-holidayssham-contracting

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/october-2024/20241017-gogikar-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases