Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-06-11-moussa-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Xteria Designs
- Penalty
- $6,660
- Employees affected
- 1
- Awards cited
- MA000123
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Respondent, who operated Xteria Designs, a residential building and construction services business in Leppington, NSW. A young, 15-year-old worker was employed on a casual basis between November 2021 and January 2022. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in August 2022 after believing the worker was owed entitlements under the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020. It was alleged that the Respondent did not pay wages for the final two weeks of work, resulting in underpayment of casual minimum wage, casual loading, and industry allowances. He allegedly failed to comply with the Compliance Notice.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is taking legal action against the Respondent for failing to comply with a Compliance Notice. The notice required him to calculate and back-pay the worker’s entitlements. The FWO is seeking a penalty and an order for the Respondent to pay amounts allegedly owing to the Applicant, plus superannuation and interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for June 28, 2024. The maximum penalty the Respondent faces is $6,660.
What it means for employers
Employers, particularly in the building and construction industry, must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements. Employers should ensure they understand their obligations regarding minimum wages, casual loading, and industry allowances, especially when employing young workers.
What it means for employees
Employees, especially young workers, should be aware of their workplace rights and entitlements. If they have concerns about their pay or entitlements, they should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Interpreter services are available.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/june-2024/11062024-moussa-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →