Skip to main content
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 21 May 2023

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2023-05-24-rika-foods-second-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Rika Foods North Melbourne Pty Ltd
Penalty
$14,000
Employees affected
1

What happened

Rika Foods North Melbourne Pty Ltd, a former juice and coffee bar in Collingwood, and its director, Radomir Pantovic, failed to pass on $14,400 in JobKeeper payments to a casual employee. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in November 2021, requiring the company to back-pay the entitlements. This is the second time the company has faced penalties from the Fair Work Ombudsman, following a previous case in 2022 involving a visa holder worker.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $26,640 penalty against Rika Foods North Melbourne Pty Ltd and a $5,328 penalty against Radomir Pantovic for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The Court ordered the company to pay the $14,400 in JobKeeper payments, plus interest, to the worker. The judge found the failure to comply was deliberate and showed no regret. The matter has been referred to the Commissioner of Taxation for investigation.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure JobKeeper payments and other government-funded schemes are passed on to employees as intended. Failure to comply with Compliance Notices can result in significant penalties and referral to the Commissioner of Taxation. The Fair Work Ombudsman prioritises compliance in the fast food, restaurant, and café sectors.

What it means for employees

Employees should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they believe they have not received their correct entitlements, including JobKeeper payments. Free advice and assistance are available through the Fair Work Infoline.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratessham-contractingwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2023-media-releases/may-2023/20230524-rika-foods-second-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases