Skip to main content
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 19 December 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-12-22-bgszo-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
BGSZO Pty Ltd
Penalty
$15,982
Employees affected
1

What happened

BGSZO Pty Ltd, formerly Up Dog Diesel in Ipswich, Queensland, failed to comply with a Fair Work Ombudsman Compliance Notice. The company serviced the mining industry and employed a tyre fitter from April 2020 to April 2021. The Compliance Notice related to unpaid accrued annual leave entitlements. The company and its sole director, Dwane Johnson, were penalised after failing to back-pay the worker until legal action commenced. The Fair Work Ombudsman received a request for assistance from the worker.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $13,330 penalty on BGSZO Pty Ltd and a $2,652 penalty on Dwane Johnson. These penalties resulted from the company's failure to comply with a Compliance Notice requiring back-payment of entitlements. The worker received the owed entitlements only after the Fair Work Ombudsman initiated legal proceedings. Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker stressed the consequences of ignoring Compliance Notices.

What it means for employers

Employers must act on Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties in addition to back-paying workers' entitlements. It is crucial to ensure all employee entitlements are calculated and paid correctly.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have not received their correct pay or entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Interpreter services are available.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesannual-leavemodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/december-2022/20221222-bgszo-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases