Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 4 December 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-12-05-melbourne-digital-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$33,300
Employees affected
4

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd, a software development company, and its sole director, Julian Smith. This followed requests for assistance from four workers employed in IT roles between one month and over four months in 2021. A Fair Work Inspector issued Compliance Notices in October and November 2021, believing the company had underpaid minimum wages and annual leave entitlements. The workers included an Indian national and a Pakistani national on temporary graduate visas.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd failed to comply with Compliance Notices requiring back-payment of entitlements. The company faces penalties of up to $33,300 per contravention, and Mr Smith faces penalties of up to $6,660 per contravention. The court is also expected to order rectification of the alleged underpayments, including interest and superannuation. A directions hearing is scheduled for December 6, 2022.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements, plus interest and superannuation. The Assurance Protocol provides a safe avenue for visa holders to raise concerns without fear of visa repercussions.

What it means for employees

Employees concerned about their pay or entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Visa holders can seek help through the Assurance Protocol without risking their visa status.

underpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesannual-leavevisa-holders

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/december-2022/20221205-melbourne-digital-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases