Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2022-12-05-melbourne-digital-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $33,300
- Employees affected
- 4
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd, a software development company, and its sole director, the Respondent. This followed requests for assistance from four workers employed in IT roles between one month and over four months in 2021. A Fair Work Inspector issued Compliance Notices in October and November 2021, believing the company had underpaid minimum wages and annual leave entitlements. The workers included an Indian national and a Pakistani national on temporary graduate visas.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd failed to comply with Compliance Notices requiring back-payment of entitlements. The company faces penalties of up to $33,300 per contravention, and the Respondent faces penalties of up to $6,660 per contravention. The court is also expected to order rectification of the alleged underpayments, including interest and superannuation. A directions hearing is scheduled for December 6, 2022.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements, plus interest and superannuation. The Assurance Protocol provides a safe avenue for visa holders to raise concerns without fear of visa repercussions.
What it means for employees
Employees concerned about their pay or entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Visa holders can seek help through the Assurance Protocol without risking their visa status.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/december-2022/20221205-melbourne-digital-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →